Видео

Very well explained! I’ve had the Dynax 5 version, as one of the differences with the Alpha Sweet II version it doesn’t have the flap in the mirror box. Overall Dynax 5 is great, but sometimes I got this kind of red line (maybe it was a light leak?) on several frames I’ve shoot. I’ve checked the light seals condition of mine, but it turns out all the light seals just in the right place. Do you know where the problem is?

Nice to see the face behind the voice! Cute pup.

Just picked one up. However, the shutter lever seems stuck :/

Man i love my m42s but u better not be in a rush to put a new lens on

You’re right. Pentax should have put a clip on the inside of the battery screw to keep it from falling out. After all the research they failed at this implementation.

I bought my first T3 in 1975. What a great camera

It looks cheap and what's the market for a point and shoot half frame camera ? surely that market uses digital or phone cameras which don't cost £400+ would have been better coming out with a device aimed at 35mm Photographers with some advanced features and ability to use vintage lenses

Interstellar brought me here.

excuse me sir, when I turn on the camera the text that appears is bc, what does that mean, sir?

I just got this camera a couple of weeks ago. Great camera love it. It takes very good pictures for the pictures I like to take.

I have a question!! What do you do if you just bought a sd card for your camera but it says the card may be damaged or broken but it’s not because I just got it

I recently picked up a 18mm quantaray with a nikon AF mount. Can’t find much else over here (UK) is there an EU equivalent for this brand?

Ok I bought a bushnell range finder v2 model second hand well even though I put a new battery in it still does not read any targets when I put the crosshairs on it and push the measure button could you fix this and possible do a video on repairing this viewfinder and possibly make a video on it I can send it to you and pay for repairs

Just inherited one of these from my grandma who passed away at 102 🩷

Glad I found this video. Just picked up one of these to add to the collection. 👍

2.9167e-17 parsecs whoa that’s close… 😉

Hi, David! I was just wondering if you could put a link for the battery & charger, or recommend some good ones?

how come most of the pictures look like HDR

Thanks so quick and simple! Ready to snap away for the night!!

ah.. uses a size 'aaa' battery - good to know!

I have the f/2 and the f/2.8 and I enjoy them both on my film OM bodies. :-) Thanks for the analysis!

I just picked up a used D70 to use with some vintage lenses I acquired. There is something to be had about using this beast/boat anchor of a camera. Thank you for these straight to the point, easy to follow video lessons!

I think we can call this one Lomo 😁👍🏻

I think Sigma did a Qauntaray version of this, same spec

Looking at the front of the lens I always thought that the plastic bits are just a simple mask that can be peeled off. It is baffling to me that they went to the trouble of actually cutting off parts of the lens. I can't think of any possible performance benefits that can't be achieved by a simple mask. With that said, I kind of like the squarish bokeh, but it would be nice to have it as an option and not a permanent feature.

The more accurate title would be "An ALMOST Round Glass Review" 😆 Sorry, I couldn't help myself 😬

I always slide the tab back, then close door, then release tab. I know.. seems extra careful. But I’ve never had any broken tabs on my cameras. Especially like the notorious Nikon 6006. Plastic tab. ツ never slam the door

Would love to hear your thoughts on the 21mm f1.8 and 50mm f1.1 mark ii if you could get ahold of them.

Good afternoon, I wanted to ask you a question, I currently have a Canon 5D classic to which I adapt several Zuiko lenses (50mm f:1.4, 50mm f:1.8, 75-150 f:4 and 500mm f:8 mirror lens) the truth is that I love the construction that the zuiko have. I am currently interested in taking bird photography and I am using the 500mm f:8 extensively, however on low light days it is impossible to use it with the Canon 5D Classic since above ISO 800 the noise is already annoying and when shooting handheld I should always be about 1/500 or 1/1000 (on sunny days I have achieved good results), for that reason I am considering buying a 300 f:4.5. My question is that I am new to the subject of photography and I do not understand much about the aberrations or lack of detail that may exist between the different telephoto lenses. Among the lenses I have a sigma 28-300 1:3.5-6.3 dg macro with autofocus (more modern construction lens and only 490g in weight), beyond gaining a step of light with the zuiko 300 f:4.5, I will see Any improvement in image quality? I know that they are lenses of very different construction and separated by many years but I would like to know if I win something or if it would be something similar. Thank you very much for your time.

Just started shooting a lot of this film. First rolls at 400 in ID-11 look pretty good. The pushed ones (800) in Rodinal 1:25 and 1:50 seem to have less shadow detail, especially the 1:50 one. Pity I needed the 800 speed, but the results are still ok. Might go for HP5 for the next shoot though, let's see (8 more rolls to develop tomorrow). Great vid!

Very useful David. Thanks!

A very good description of the Minolta X370 because I own one. I bought my Minolta X370 as my first 35mm camera in 1985, which I followed with the Minolta X700 6 months later and finally 6 months after I bought my last Minolta X570. I used them a lot, you can see the usage on the metal casing with all kind of scratches. There are still in good condition to be use. Here is a tip to keep your camera dry. All these little package you get from suitcases to keep inside dry, I throwed them in my camera bags. That work for me for last 40 years.